Skip to content

scrolly vs PaperMark and public HTML links

scrolly vs PaperMark and publishing a public HTML link

If you have an AI-generated HTML document, you have a few ways to share it: run the open-source PaperMark yourself, publish the file at a public URL with a hosting tool, or use a managed service. scrolly is the managed option that is free to start, locks the document down, and shows you who opened it, with nothing to self-host.

Side by side

scrolly, PaperMark, and a public HTML link

scrolly, PaperMark, and a public HTML link
CapabilityscrollyPaperMark and public HTML publishing
Setup and hostingscrolly advantage: Managed and hosted; nothing to deployPaperMark: self-host and operate; public link: a hosting tool
Access controlscrolly advantage: Password, expiry, email gate, and allowlist out of the boxPaperMark: configurable; public link: anyone with the URL
Sandboxed viewing of untrusted HTMLscrolly advantage: Served from a separate origin in a locked sandboxPaperMark: depends on your setup; public link: none
Per-recipient open analyticsOpens, dwell, and scroll depth per recipient, built inPaperMark: built in; public link: none without extra tooling
Revoke access after sharingscrolly advantage: Disable any link instantly; it stops working at the edgePaperMark: yes; public link: re-host or delete the file
Cost to startFree plan with the full security modelPaperMark: free but self-operated; public link: host-dependent
Full control of the stackManaged service (portability seams, but we run it)PaperMark: complete control if you self-host

Why switch

Why a managed link beats self-hosting or a public URL

No infrastructure to run

Self-hosting an open-source tool means a server, a database, storage, updates, and uptime to own. scrolly is the hosted alternative: paste your HTML, get a secure link, and never think about the stack underneath it.

A public URL is not access control

Publishing an HTML file at a public link means anyone who gets the URL can open it, forever, with no idea who did. scrolly puts a password, expiry, email gate, or allowlist in front of the same document and records every open.

Untrusted HTML is sandboxed by default

Your document renders on a separate origin inside a locked sandbox with a strict content security policy, so its scripts can never reach your account. You get that isolation without configuring a single header yourself.

Being fair

Where PaperMark or a public link makes more sense

PaperMark is open source, so if you want complete control of the code and data, must self-host for policy reasons, or enjoy running your own infrastructure, it is a strong choice and worth supporting. A plain public HTML link is genuinely the right tool when a document is meant to be open to the world and you do not care who reads it, such as public documentation or a launch page. scrolly is for the middle ground that is most common with AI-generated documents: you want it managed, locked to specific people, and tracked, without operating anything.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Is scrolly an alternative to PaperMark?
Yes. PaperMark is an open-source, self-hosted document-sharing tool; scrolly is a managed, free-to-start service that hosts your HTML, adds access controls and per-recipient analytics, and requires no infrastructure to run.
Why not just publish my HTML file at a public link?
A public link is open to anyone who has the URL and tells you nothing about who opened it. scrolly serves the same document behind a password, expiry, email gate, or allowlist, sandboxes it on a separate origin, and records every open per recipient.
Do I need to host anything to use scrolly?
No. scrolly is fully managed. You upload a self-contained HTML file, scrolly hosts it and serves it securely, and you share the short link. There is no server, database, or deployment to operate.
Is scrolly really free to start?
Yes. The free plan includes sandboxed viewing, every access mode, and full engagement analytics, so you can secure and track a shared document without paying.